Re: [PATCH] bash: offer to show (un)staged changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> *sigh*
>
> I was hoping it would work well for the really huge repository case,
> like WebKit, where the stats against the work tree just kill the
> user space application.

Even hot-cache? My perception is that in hot-cache conditions the perf is good.

If it is cold-cache, what in the end you are hoping for is "pegging"
some stuff in the cache. Perhaps there's a way to tell the kernel to
skew the cache eviction scheme. Still, if the kernel's algorythms are
good, the kernel knows more about your fs usage patterns than you
do...

cheers,



m
-- 
 martin.langhoff@xxxxxxxxx
 martin@xxxxxxxxxx -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux