On Sunday 18 January 2009, Mike Hommey <mh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote about 'Re: [WIP Patch 00/12] Refactoring the http API': >On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:30:12AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Mike Hommey <mh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> > [I] >> > haven't actually tested it, though, as the code hasn't changed much, >> > I guess it should be fine. >> > 6 files changed, 162 insertions(+), 304 deletions(-) >> >> Thanks. >> But I am puzzled by what you mean by "haven't actually tested it". Do >> you mean you do not use http transport very much yourself, or even when >> you do you do not use a version of git with these patches applied? >I mean I haven't tested the rebased version. The original version was >tested extensively a year ago. I don't use http transport that much >now. I know it's uncool of me to ask to do this, BUT... Do we have a good test-suite for this? If so, I can always run it against any number of different WEBDAV implementations. I have a glut of CPU time on many of my systems and enjoy breaking things. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. bss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
