Re: [PATCH/RFC] git-am: Make it easier to see which patch failed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Jonas Flodén" <jonas@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> When git-am fails it's not always easy to see which patch failed,
> since it's often hidden by a lot of error messages.
> Add an extra line which prints the name of the failed patch just
> before the resolve message to make it easier to find.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Flodén <jonas@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>> Maybe
>>
>> -               echo Patch failed at $msgnum.
>> +               echo Patch failed at $msgnum($FIRSTLINE).
>
> How about this instead. Though the line could get very long.
> This makes the line stand out a little more.
>
>  git-am.sh |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/git-am.sh b/git-am.sh
> index 4b157fe..09c2f9c 100755
> --- a/git-am.sh
> +++ b/git-am.sh
> @@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ do
>  	fi
>  	if test $apply_status != 0
>  	then
> -		echo Patch failed at $msgnum.
> +		printf '\nPatch failed at %s (%s)\n' "$msgnum" "$FIRSTLINE"
>  		stop_here_user_resolve $this
>  	fi

Looks sane except that I do not think you need printf nor the leading
blank line, i.e.

	echo "Patch failed at $msgnum ($FIRSTLINE)"



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux