Re: [PATCH take 3 0/4] color-words improvements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 2009 January 16 03:02:33 Santi Béjar wrote:
> 2009/1/16 Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Santi Béjar wrote:
>>> If everything works as I think (it's late night :-) with the above two
>>> lines:
>>>
>>> matrix[a,b,c]
>>> matrix{d,b,c}
>>>
>>> the word diff would be
>>>
>>> matrix<RED>[<GREEN>{<RED>a<GREEN>d<RESET>,b,c<RED>]<GREEN>}<RED>
>
>So, I see, it is a matter of finding the right regexp.
>
>But the only use case for me is of this kind, and I think for the
>others too. So maybe an easier way to specify it could be worth. But
>I'll write an alias as this is the only regexp I would use, apart from
>the default word diff.

I think that the C/C++ language word-diff driver would work here, and there 
should be a shortcut for that.
-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.                     ,= ,-_-. =. 
bss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                     ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy           `-'(. .)`-' 
http://iguanasuicide.net/                      \_/     

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux