Hi, On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Petr Baudis wrote: > On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 03:17:14AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > I wondered what the point was, and I would _welcome_ links that > > pointed to the mails containing the patches (identified either by > > patch ids or by manual editing; best would be to have both methods at > > the same time). > > Well, but you already have that, or at least an approximation. Oh, I see! Somehow I missed that this link exists for all non-merge commits... > I was not actually planning to carry the patch over the next gitweb > update since I got no feedback on it (IIRC) since I implemented it. Well, now you got one: I find it nice. And I agree with you on the false positive thing: it is better to have that link also for commits for which no mails can be found. I just had to scratch my head about what "mail" is about... Ciao, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
