Hi, On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Sverre Rabbelier wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:01, Johan Herland <johan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > "modify" does the "git reset --soft HEAD^" (Anders' suggestion) I could live with "modify". > > "amend" requires a "git commit --amend" (current behaviour) > > Why have amend do the same as edit? If you add an 'amend' one instead > make it drop you into an editor to change the commit message. That's a > workflow I often use. Often times I do not have a proper commit > message when I commit (sometimes it is the result of "git commit -a -m > "tmp"). To me having an 'amend' command that allows one to edit the > commit message would make sense a lot :). > > > "edit" == "amend", but is deprecated and goes away in the future > > And as such, have edit do what it currently does. FWIW I fully agree. If at all, I'd introduce 'examine' as a synonym to 'edit' (might be more intuitive). However, for the same reason (is it intuitive?) I am not fully convinced of 'amend' either. Because --amend _can_ mean that you change the diff of the commit. Maybe 'correct', 'redact' or 'rephrase'? BTW I was not fully happy with 'edit' back then, either, which is the reason why I showed the usage in the comment _above_ the commit list. But nobody could suggest a name that I found convincingly better. Ciao, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
