Junio C Hamano escreveu:
Without any explicit -o parameter, we correctly avoided putting the resulting patch output to the toplevel. We should do the same when the user gave a relative pathname to be consistent with this case and also with how other commands handle relative pathnames.
Works great, only the resulting output to the screen is a bit ugly/confusing:
drivers/net/../../../0001-sc92031-more-useful-banner-in-kernel-log.patch drivers/net/../../../0002-sc92031-remove-meaningless-version-string.patch drivers/net/../../../0003-sc92031-inline-SC92031_DESCRIPTION.patch drivers/net/../../../0004-sc92031-use-device-id-directly-instead-of-made-up-n.patch drivers/net/../../../0005-sc92031-add-a-link-to-the-datasheet.patch I would expect: ../../../0001-sc92031-more-useful-banner-in-kernel-log.patch ../../../0002-sc92031-remove-meaningless-version-string.patch ../../../0003-sc92031-inline-SC92031_DESCRIPTION.patch ../../../0004-sc92031-use-device-id-directly-instead-of-made-up-n.patch ../../../0005-sc92031-add-a-link-to-the-datasheet.patch (after all, I am still inside the drivers/net directory) -- Cesar Eduardo Barros cesarb@xxxxxxxxxx cesar.barros@xxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
