Re: stopping patches from just floating by

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, jidanni@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> I notice lots of "Merge branch qq/bla". And think, hmmm, Mr. QQ must
> be using Documentation/everyday.txt's [[Individual Developer
> (Participant)]] git-push methods, for a more efficient way of getting
> his patches included by the maintainer.

Nope, that would lead to "Merge git://qq.org/git bla". In fact, Junio is 
getting the patches by email, and then using that workflow in his own tree 
to manage the maintence process. That is, he creates a branch for each 
patch series that someone sends that looks ready for more exposure, by 
starting with some plausible commit and applying the series of patches, 
and then he can merge than branch into pu, next, master, or maint as 
needed. This is particularly useful for pu, where he redoes all the merges 
frequently; if he worked by just applying the patches, every time he 
wanted to drop a series that he'd applied before some other series, he'd 
have to pick out the conflict resolutions from the original author's 
changes.

	-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux