"Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > The application answers really need to be reworked; we need to > address our 2008 results in these parts. By the way, do you know what happened with git-sequencer project? If I remember correctly there was agreement on sequences mini-language (I think), and there was git-sequencer prototype in shell, using git-cherry-pick if I remember correctly, and even git-rebase and git-am etc reworked to make use of git-sequencer. Stephan Beyer wrote that he has some preliminary version of builtin git-sequencer (in C), and that it makes git-rebase--interactive and like faster than current implementation... but builtin sequencer never materialized on git mailing list as a patch, if I remember correctly, and of course it was not merged into git either. > The ideas box is once again open for suggestions. Please start > proposing student projects, and possible mentors. Hmm... take a look what features competition has (Darcs, Bazaar-NG, Subversion, Mercurial, Monotone)... > > > Since the program is smaller, there is a chance we won't be accepted > this year due to space constraints. But I think its still worthwhile > to prepare everything and hope for the best. And before you can > ask, no, my employee status with OSPO doesn't improve our odds > for acceptance. :-) Perhaps at least _one_ project. I think that resumable clone / resumable fetch would be a good thing to have... -- Jakub Narebski Poland ShadeHawk on #git -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
