Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 01:30:23AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> This arrangement to have the third process could even open the possibility >> of having it read from git and write to pager, and not launching the pager >> if there is no interesting data from git to feed it with. >> >> I do not know if I like the performance implications associated with it, >> though. > > Ugh. That has definitely been a requested feature, but the thought of > essentially running "cat" in our pipeline strikes me as a bit kludgey. > > On the other hand, we are by definition going to the pager in that case, > so in theory performance is less of a consideration. > > But see my other mail for why a third process is hard to always do on > Windows. Heh, this late at night just before going to bed, I am allowed to say that I do not care about Windows at all ;-). More dedicated and competent people will solve it for us while I am sleeping. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
