Re: gitweb index performance (Re: [PATCH] gitweb: support the rel=vcs-* microformat)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,

On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, J.H. wrote:

Look at either Lea's or my caching engines, it will help dramatically on something of that size.

Speaking of which, do you have any performance comparisons between the two?
Lea's got some - I can see if I can dig up my copy (or if she's paying attention maybe she can publish them), though either one is orders of magnitude faster than the normal code. Beyond that it waffles back and forth which one is faster & why mainly because of the approaches we each took on the caching. Generally speaking I would push people more towards Lea's than my work, if nothing else hers is more in line with current gitweb, though I have had some thoughts about undoing my file breakout and getting my code base back up to speed.

- John 'Warthog9' Hawley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux