Re: [RFC PATCH] diff --no-index: test for pager after option parsing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thomas Rast <trast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I noticed this while working on the earlier patch for diff --no-index.
> It seems like the right thing to do (and passes tests), but I don't
> have a clue about git's normal setup sequences, so I'm flagging it
> RFC.

I think the patch itself makes sense from the logic flow point of view.

But I wonder if it still makes a difference in real life.idn't we stop
reporting the exit status from the pager some time ago?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux