Hi, On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On jeu, jan 01, 2009 at 04:38:09 +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > > Nothing fancy, really, just a straight-forward implementation of the > > heavily under-documented and under-analyzed paience diff algorithm. > > Btw, what is the status of this series ? I see it neither in pu nor in > next. And I would gladly see it included in git. AFAICT people wanted to be reasonably sure that it is worth the effort. Although I would like to see it in once it is fleshed out -- even if it does not meet our usefulness standard -- because people said Git is inferior for not providing a patience diff. If we have --patience, we can say "but we have it, it's just not useful, check for yourself". > On jeu, jan 01, 2009 at 07:45:21 +0000, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > So could we have some actual real data on it? > > For example, look at the following (shamelessly stolen from the real > life example http://glandium.org/blog/?p=120). Due to the lines being much longer than 80 characters, this example was not useful to me. Ciao, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
