Miklos Vajna, 04.01.2009:
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 05:11:22PM +0100, Markus Heidelberg <markus.heidelberg@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > Another question: should this patch be split up into two, one for
> > maint/master and another for next?
>
> AFAIK sending patches against next is not preferred at all.
>From Documentation/SubmittingPatches:
If you are preparing a work based on "next" branch,
that is fine, but please mark it as such.
I guess the only reason is a required dependency not available in
'master'.
> You should
> send your patches against master, or - if you have a strong reason - on
> top of a given topic branch.
This patch depends on a commit in 'next'. But right, I could have
mentioned that it's against 'mh/cherry-default' as Junio suggested a few
days ago.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
