Re: [PATCH next] git-cherry usage: correct nesting of commit-ish options

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Markus Heidelberg, 04.01.2009:
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Heidelberg <markus.heidelberg@xxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> What is the preferred way to say the patch is against next? In the
> subject like this?
> Another question: should this patch be split up into two, one for
> maint/master and another for next?

For the second patch against next I meant it being based on origin/next
that already includes the extracted patch for maint/master.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux