On Tue, 30 Dec 2008, Jakub Narebski wrote: > > I think it would be easy to add '-l' also to git-ls-files. Please > remember to provide size only for blobs, as provoding size for trees > would make it harder to change to future packv4, where tree objects > would be stored deconstructed. Personally, more than "git ls-files -l", I've occasionally wanted a real "git ls" that really looks more like "ls". That includes: - turning a list of files in a subdirectory into a "directory" entry (which is not very natural for "git ls-files" as an index operation, since the index is fundamentally flat). - yes, adding "-l" as an option, but really showing the stat information. Right now, you can do "git ls-files --stage", and it will show a kind of extended information, but while it shows the mode, it doesn't show the owner/timestamp/etc parts of the index, and those are sometimes interesting. Btw, the "ls-tree -l" format is not nice. Don't use it as a basis to pattern "ls -l" (or if you want to just extend ls-tree, whatever). Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
