is there an easier way to do this ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



ok, now I'm in this for real, archiving versions of our website project (5k 
files approx)

so here is the workflow:

- copy version 1 files into GIT dir

- open git bash

$ git init

$ git add .

$ git commit -m "version1"

all vanilla ? cool
next job = store version 2, so delete version 1 files from GIT dir, copy in 
version 2
version2 has different files from 1 - which ones? Out of 5k files could be 
1% = 50 new ones, and same amount removed. Why should I care, with such a 
powerful friend as git around, n'est pas?
THIS TIME we are going to be CLEVER and use "-a" flag on commit to pick up 
any files that have been REMOVED (or "deleted" in git-speak)

$ git commit -a -m "version2"

BUT this does not pick up any new ones that have been added,

and when we run

$ git status > ../git_status.txt

these are referred to as "untracked files"
only problem there are 50 ish
is there not another flag on git commit to treat any untracked file as a new 
file ?
(would save me typing or creating a list out of these untracked ones and 
feeding them into git add)

I know, I realise now I should have looked up git-commit in the manual - in 
case its not there, pls enlighten me !



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux