Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.6.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 10:36:27PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> * The packfile machinery hopefully is more robust when dealing with
>   corrupt packs if redundant objects involved in the corruption are
>   available elsewhere.

Has anyone written a summary of how Git's redundancy operates?

* What would be the probability for a single bit flip to corrupt the 
repository?

* And what is the situation where a single bit flip can not corrupt the 
database?

* When (which commands/functions) is error detection done?

Heikki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux