On Sunday 2008 December 21 15:54:18 you wrote: > "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." <bss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > I took the alternative approach. > > Thanks. I was thinking about doing this instead; how the reference to the > HOW-TO is done is different, and I am hoping that it would give better > result for HTML version at least. I like the different link style (still learning asciidoc here), although I am mainly concerned with the manpage output. However, I intentionally avoided using the word "branch" in my prose, because that implies (to me) that the ref is what is remembered and important. That's not technically correct, as refs are not part of the history that is considered during the later merge. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. bss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
