Re: [git] how to check remote git repo for updates without pull/fetch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday 2008 December 20 17:41:13 David Aguilar wrote:
> 2008/12/20 James Cloos <cloos@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > #!/bin/bash
> > #
> > # does this git repo need a pull?
> > #
> > l=$(git log|head -1|awk '{print $NF}')
> > r=$(git ls-remote origin heads/master|awk '{print $1}')
> > test "${r}" != "${l}"
> >
> >
> > -JimC
> > --
> > James Cloos <cloos@xxxxxxxxxxx>         OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6
>
> Hello
>
> Your script will report false positives if you run that in a branch
> where you've made local commits since git log's output will list a
> commit that's not on the remote side.

Change the last line to:
test "${r}" != "$(git merge-base "${r}" "${l}")" and those false positives 
should go away.

The script is far from a complete solution to the OPs problem though.  It only 
checks one, specific remote branch.  It only checks against the current 
branch.  It is the core of something that might be useful as another 
subcommand to 'git remote' though.
-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.                     ,= ,-_-. =. 
bss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                     ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy           `-'(. .)`-' 
http://iguanasuicide.net/                      \_/     

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux