Re: Odd merge behaviour involving reverts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, Jay Soffian wrote:
> 
> Instead of reverting the revert, why not rebase the branch which was
> merged to the point after the revert was done?

Sure, you can do that too. However, that has its own set of problems, ie 
all the "ok, who else was working based on this branch" thing.

But no, there are no single right answers. Rebasing may well be a 
reasonable approach.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux