Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > Wow. That must be one of the, uhm, less beautiful ways to write > > if (action == REVERT) > warning("revert on a merge commit may not do what you " > "expect."); > else if (action != CHERRY_PICK) > die("Unknown action on a merge commit."); > > Besides, I am actually pretty much against this change. You already have > to ask very explicitely to revert a merge, by specifying a parent number. > If I ask for something explicitely, I do not want the tool to tell me that > it's dangerous. I know that already, thankyouverymuch. Or you may not have known that it is dangerous, but the new warning does not give you enough clue where to go next, so this warning does not give real value. It is pretty much meaningless noise to users. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html