Re: [PATCH] fast-export: deal with tag objects that do not have a tagger

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 03:20:29PM -0800, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Such a "faking" can well be done, and should be done, on the consuming end
> of the information.  If you fake using the commit authorship, you would
> never be able to tell from the result which one is faked and which one is
> genuine.
> 
> I think you'd rather want to see "Unspecified Tagger" in the resulting tag
> object (or even better, a tag object without the tagger field created by
> the fast-import process), and leave the interpretation of missing tagger
> information to the consumers.

Aah, I missed that Dscho's patch will not just not die(), but it _will_
output a stream that fast-import will import. So just forget my
complain. :-)

And Dscho, thanks!

Attachment: pgpxhtZwVWAau.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux