Hi, On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 06:23:57AM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote: > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 01:03:03AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > But a change to the function signature of feature subroutines is not > > something I'd like to apply while other series that want to add new > > features are still cooking. How about doing these two patches as the > > first thing that goes to 'next' after 1.6.1, and then force other series > > rebase on top of your change? Alternatively, we could make you wait until > > other series do settle in 'next' and then apply your change rebased on > > them, but I think that is probably less optimal. > > OK, I'll resubmit the patches on top of 'next' once 1.6.1 is > released. Thanks for your help, is it worth keeping them separate? Just a single patch makes more sense to me, the interface is much nicer in the latter than in the former. :-) Petr "Pasky" Baudis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
