Re: [PATCH] pack-objects: don't use too many threads with few objects

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 05:15:44PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Perhaps the two runs are seeing different number of CPUs (hence threads)
> available?  That would then change the distribution of the work itself
> (i.e. what slice of obj-list goes as a single chunk to be processed) and
> would affect the outcome.

I am seeing the same failure as Mike on one of my boxen.  Each run sees
the same number of threads (4 in my case).

> Does the second test this patch adds fail?

With your patch, the added "both should match" test fails. So it seems
to be about doing a second run at all, not the difference in index
versions.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux