On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Only commit message has changed. > > Which is a bit unnice, because it will conflict with the original [3/3] > that I queued already (with a pair of fixes, including but not limited to > the one you sent "Oops, it should have been like this" for). > > I can hand wiggle the patch to make it apply, but I'd prefer if I did not > have to do this every time I receive a patch. I'm sorry about that; I have forgot to change order of patches to have original 1/3, 3/3, 2/3 (I should have used 'stg float' for that). > I think the conflict was trivial (just a single s/rev/short_rev/) and I > did not make a silly mistake when I fixed it up, but please check the > result on 'pu' after I push the results out. I did the reordering, and gitweb on compared top of reordered stack of patches with gitweb from top of 'pu' branch, and the only difference in the area touched by git_blame improvements series is one comment I have added in v2 of 3/3. Thank you for your work. -- Jakub Narebski Poland -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
