Re: epic fsck SIGSEGV! (was Recovering from epic fail (deleted .git/objects/pack))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 2008 December 10 17:40:28 Linus Torvalds wrote:
>On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, R. Tyler Ballance wrote:
>Anyway, that's a really annoying problem, and it's a bug in git.
>
>That stupid fsck commit walker walks the parents recursively.
>
>And judging by the fact that gdb also SIGSEGV's for you when
>doing the backtrace, it looks like the gdb backtrace tracer is _also_
>recursive, and _also_ hits the same issue ;)
>
>So you have definitely found a real bug.
>
>But we should definitely fix this braindamage in fsck. Rather than
>recursively walk the commits, we should add them to a commit list and just
>walk the list iteratively.

Suppose I fixed this tonight.  Would you need anything other than a patch 
(series) from me?  (E.g. copyright assignment or something else legal [vs. 
technical])
-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.                     ,= ,-_-. =. 
bss03@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx                      ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy           `-'(. .)`-' 
http://iguanasuicide.org/                      \_/     

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux