Re: [RFC/PATCH] Add support for a pdf version of the user manual

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Leo Razoumov" <slonik.az@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 12/10/08, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> "Leo Razoumov" <slonik.az@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>  > BTW, for those of us without dblatex, is it possible to have pdf
>>  > manual pregenerated the same way html and man pages are pregenerated
>>  > for official releases in the git repo?
>>
>>
>> Those of us includes myself, so...
>
> Ouch:-) Does it mean that such a useful patch has a low probability of
> being accepted?

As an optional "make" target, as long as it works for people with the
necessary toolchain, I have no problem with the patch, but I would
complain if the usual "make doc" try to run the tool I do not want to run
with my regular build.  I didn't check.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux