First, thanks for the comments. 2008/12/9 Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx>: > Hi, > > On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Santi Béjar wrote: > >> The basic idea is: >> >> - Easily create bundles with the current branch. >> - Be able to push to defined bundles in remote.<remote>.url >> - Only add new objects by default (do not lose objects) > > That is probably not what people need. Usually, when bundles are sent > around, you need _incremental_ bundles. I do not find convenient strictly incremental bundles, because then you (or the other people) needs to fetch every single bundle. What I do is add new objects until the bundle is too big and then create a bundle with a new base. This way you don't have to worry if the other person has applied the last bundle or not. > IOW if you already have a bundle, > you want to create a new bundle that contains everything that is new, _in > addition_ to the existing bundle. >> while [ $# != 0 ] ; do > > Heh, I did not realize just how _used_ I got to the conventions in Git's > shell programming, until I thought "Should this not use 'test' instead > of brackets?" I don't have problems either way, I'll change to follow Git's conventions. > >> while [ $# != 0 ] ; do >> refs="$refs$LF$1" && shift >> done > > That is equivalent to refs="$*", no? Almost, IFS is set to line-feed so I needed to put $LF instead of spaces. > > Anyway, I found reading your shell script quite hard, because of excessive > use of brackets and single line && chains (which lack proper error > handling, BTW). I've tried to catch errors, but maybe not enough. Santi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
