2008/12/5 Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Santi Béjar <santi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> 2008/12/5 Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx>: >>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 6:02 PM, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> [...] >> >>>>> But here are the links anyway. The order is rather random. >>>> >>>> Moreover the _quality_ of those links is very random. >>> >>> Exactly, I didn't choose them, that's what people have been tagging as >>> "git" in delicious.com. I'm subscribed to the RSS feed and saving the >>> ones that appear a lot. >>> >>> In fact I don't like some of them, but that's what the "public" finds >>> interesting. >> >> So I don't see the value of such a list. You can go to delicious and >> get it. > > Try it. You can't see which ones are new, which are completely > irrelevant. There are duplicates and you can't see the popularity / > freshness ratio, or "hotness", never mind the most popular this week. > > Apparently some people already found interesting links they haven't > seen before, so at lest there's value for them. Maybe they should. Sorry for my ignorance. > >> Another thing that could be great is filtering this list to >> those that pass a certain criteria (mainly quality, up to date, ...) >> and present it in an attractive way, with summaries, categorized by >> type (trick, tutorial, comparison,...), ... > If this view is more or less what you have in mind I'll try to help. Santi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
