Re: [PATCH 0/6 (v2)] Detecting HEAD more reliably while cloning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano schrieb:
> Instead of introducing a full-fledged protocol extension, this round hides
> the new information in the same place as the server capabilities list that
> is used to implement protocol extension is hidden from older clients.

Not that it makes a lot of difference, but why do you want to *hide* the
information? Can't we just have a capability-with-parameter:

 ... shallow no-progress include-tag head=refs/heads/foo\ bar ...

(with spaces and backslashes escaped)?

-- Hannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux