Christian Couder <chriscool@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Junio wrote: > > > > Although I fully realize that the established semantics of A..B in git is > > bottom-exclusive, top-inclusive, and this suggestion breaks the UI > > uniformity by deviating from that convention, I have to wonder if it would > > be more useful if you let the bottom commit (A in your example) also be > > skipped. > > I agree that it would be perhaps more usefull to skip the bottom commit. Actually I do not think it is such a big deal to warrant more code and complexity. "skip A..B A", if you really wanted to, would work anyway. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
