Re: Git.pm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 20 November 2008 09.34.46 you wrote:
>   I know it's quite some time since you wrote this mail originally -
> have you read the Lea's thread I have recommended? What is your current
> plan?

>   I think the current rough consensus in the Git community is to go with
> Lea's design and implementation after extending it with a nice way to
> run arbitrary Git commands. This is also desirable since then we can use
> her patches to make gitweb use Git.pm.

Hi,

Yes I read Lea's thread. My current plan is to:
	- not rush
	- analyse where the different modules are used and how (and document it)
	- understand the process of working with the git team
	- tell my fellow perl developers about this (done, so far very good response)
	- confer with the people having git related modules (a few)
	- gather ideas for what nededs to be changed (not much this far)
	- put a development strategy in place
	- understand the test mechanisms you've been using so far
	- pray hard to any helping deity and get real

Cheers, Nadim.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux