Re: why no "git fetch --dry-run" ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 04:41:57PM -0500, Leo Razoumov <slonik.az@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I am curious why there is "git push --dry-run" and no "git fetch
> --dry-run" nor "git pull --dry-run". It would make sense to keep
> push/pull/fetch as symmetric as possible.
> For example, I just want to see which branches, if any, changed on a
> remote repository since my last fetch. "git fetch -v --dry-run" would
> be handy in this case.

Actually fetch - at a core level - isn't symmetric to push, the protocol
is completely different. I haven't checked the source, but I suppose
that the push protocol has "dry run" support, while the fetch one
doesn't have.

Attachment: pgpoShryUy98L.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux