On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 2:02 AM, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 15 Nov 2008, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: > >> The gitweb_check_feature routine was being used for two different >> purposes: retrieving the actual feature value (such as the list of >> snapshot formats or the list of additional actions), and to check if a >> feature was enabled. >> >> For the latter use, since all features return an array, it led to either >> clumsy code or subtle bugs, with disabled features appearing enabled >> because (0) evaluates to 1. >> >> We fix these bugs, and simplify the code, by separating feature (list) >> value retrieval (gitweb_get_feature) from boolean feature check (i.e. >> retrieving the first/only item in the feature value list). Usage of >> gitweb_check_feature across gitweb is replaced by the appropriate call >> wherever needed. >> --- > > First, you forgot the signoff, but you have addressed that already. > > > Second, I thought at first that it would be good for the patch to also > simplify %feature hash, using "'default' => 1" instead of current bit > convoluted "'default' => [1]", at the cost of bit more code for > defensive programming. But now I think that if it is to be done, > it should be put as separate patch. Is this an ACK? 8-D -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
