Hi, On Sat, 15 Nov 2008, Ian Hilt wrote: > On Sat, 15 Nov 2008, Sverre Rabbelier wrote: > > The --reverse is applied after the --max-count, so you are seeing the > > reverse of one commit ;). For comparison, have a look at: > > > > $ git rev-list --reverse --max-count=2 > > Ah, I see. So if you didn't want the sorting to take a long time for > many commits, you would limit the output to n commits, then sort the > output. Is this the logic behind this design? Yes. It is by design, since the guy who wrote the initial --reverse support cannot think of an interesting situation where you need to list the oldest n commits. Ciao, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
