Re: [PATCH] Teach/Fix pull/fetch -q/-v options

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:47 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "Tuncer Ayaz" <tuncer.ayaz@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 4:26 AM, Tuncer Ayaz <tuncer.ayaz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Implement git-pull --quiet and git-pull --verbose by
>>> adding the options to git-pull and fixing verbosity
>>> handling in git-fetch.
>>
>> Junio,
>>
>> is there anything still missing in this patch?
>> Maybe the name of the test-case is bad.
>
> It seems to break t7600.

thanks for the good review, it sure does break.

I hadn't noticed it as I didn't compare test results
of master against my branch and assumed that that
breakage is part of common failing tests.

Shawn helped me out a little bit with debugging the test scripts
and I quickly found out that an if clause is wrong.
the diff for the last patch to correct it is:
 --- a/builtin-merge.c
 +++ b/builtin-merge.c
 @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ static unsigned char head[20], stash[20];
@@ -163,7 +144,7 @@

        argc = parse_options(argc, argv, builtin_merge_options,
                        builtin_merge_usage, 0);
-+      if (verbosity > QUIET)
++      if (verbosity == QUIET)
 +              show_diffstat = 0;


a corrected patch will arrive here in a minute.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux