I've been working quite a lot on git -> libgit2 code moving,
but the licensing stuff is a bit depressing, as I can't know
if the work I'm doing is for nothing or not.
The license decided for libgit2 is "GPL with gcc exception".
Those who are OK with relicensing their contributions under
that license for the purpose of libgit2, can you please say
so?
I'm planning on writing a tool for this that will have "ok",
"not ok" and "ask-each-patch" as options.
The list of people whose position I know is rather short.
Please correct me if you're on it and would like not to be.
Junio C. Hamano ask
Johannes Schindelin ok
Shawn O. Pearce ok
Andreas Ericsson ok
Pierre Habouzit ok
Brian Gernhardt ok
I've put everyone who "owns" more than 500 lines of code
on the bcc list, figuring your permission is important
but that you don't want the hundreds (well, one can hope)
of emails from people saying "ok". The list of major owners
was generated with "git showners *.c" in a worktree from
the next branch of git.git.
--
Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@xxxxxx
OP5 AB www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231
#!/bin/sh
test "$#" -gt 0 || { echo "Usage: $0 <file>"; exit 1; }
combined=t
while test "$#" -gt 0
do
case "$1" in
-c|--combined)
combined=t
;;
-i|--individual)
combined=
;;
--)
shift
break
;;
*)
break
;;
esac
shift
done
sort_enumerate ()
{
sed -e 's/[^(]*(\([^0-9]*\).*/\1/' -e 's/[\t ]*$//' \
| sort | uniq -c | sort -nr
}
show_owners ()
{
for f in "$@"; do
test -d "$f" && { show_owners "$f"/*; continue; }
git blame -C -C -M "$f"
done
}
if test "$combined" = t; then
echo "$@"
show_owners "$@" | sort_enumerate
else
echo "Showing one-at-a-time ownership"
for f in "$@"; do
echo "$f"
show_owners "$f" | sort_enumerate
done
fi
