Re: Can git ignore parts of files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Alan <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I have kind of an odd problem that is causing me grief in git.  I figure
> someone has a good solution here.  (Or not, they will soon.)
>
> I have a couple of kernel .config files that are checked into git.  They
> are used to test kernel configurations for the nightly builds where I
> work.
>
> We have a bunch of kernel developers working on drivers.  When they add
> a new driver, they add in the options in the test file to make it
> compile in the test builds.
>
> The problem is that the kernel config file has a timestamp at the top of
> the file that is generated by "make oldconfig" or "make config".  Other
> than removing the timestamp each time manually, is there a way to get
> git to ignore the timestamp on a merge?
>
> What happens is that the authors submit the changes on a branch in most
> cases.  Sometimes they have a version of that file that is quite out of
> date.  When I go to merge, that one file gives me grief 95% of the time.
>
> Is there an easy way around this?  Am I approaching the problem wrong?
> Is there a better way to do this?

Someone wrote a special merge algorithm to handle similar conflicts in
tracked ChangeLog files (see
http://www.mail-archive.com/bug-gnulib@xxxxxxx/msg09183.html).
Perhaps you could write a similar merge algorithm and use it?

Hope that helps,
Elijah
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux