Hi, On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote: > So we _could_ do something like > > git log {a..b} {c..d ^e} > > and just declare that { $args } is a self-contained "subset", and > effectively becomes the same thing as "$(git rev-list $args)" but with > magic no-walking semantics (ie all walking is done only _within_ the { > }, not between different groups. > > You literally _can_ do it right now that way: > > git log --no-walk $(git rev-list HEAD~5..HEAD~3) $(git rev-list > HEAD~1..) > > actually works, but that will hit argument size limits on many platforms > really quickly. > > So we could make a '{ }' in the argument space basically do a SHA1 > expansion of the range inside, and imply --no-walk. It's _not_ entirely > trivial, because we'd need to handle the fact that object flags are > sticky, and clear them in between invocations of multiple ranges, but > it's not _fundmanetally_ difficult. It's just that somebody would need > to do it. Well, do not forget the case git log ^HEAD^ {HEAD^..HEAD} $BLUB Ciao, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html