Re: Something like $Id$, $Revision$ or $Date$?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Mon, 10 Nov 2008, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
>> I would like the "$Id$" sequences to be updated automatically after a 
>> commit (ie. without the need to check out).  (Besides I would prefer 
>> $Date$ more but I can live with $Id$ I guess ;) ).

Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
> No, you don't.
>
> At least most likely you do not want that behavior.  Typically, you have 
> the $Id$ stuff in released versions to indicate what revision that version 
> came from even if the files are no longer in a Git repository.
>
> And you can have that without ever committing anything in-between, by 
> using the export-subst attributes with git-archive.  Have a look at 
> Documentation/gitattributes.txt (I agree it is underdocumented in 
> git-archive.txt).

The thing is that for some repositories I don't distinguish anything
like a "release version" of files.  For instance, I have a repository
with my configuration files, and I want to be able to do

  scp emacs system-where-git-is-not-installed:.emacs

or attaching the file in an email without worrying about anything.
Instead, what you're describing would force me to do some voodoo magic
priory to sending the file.

-- 
Best regards,                                         _     _
 .o. | Liege of Serenly Enlightened Majesty of      o' \,=./ `o
 ..o | Computer Science,  Michal "mina86" Nazarewicz   (o o)
 ooo +--<mina86*tlen.pl>--<jid:mina86*jabber.org>--ooO--(_)--Ooo--

Attachment: pgpa1ZmZXTPGw.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux