Re: Large media in git (was: How it was at GitTogether'08)?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 9 Nov 2008, Kai Blin wrote:
> On Sunday 09 November 2008 17:31:47 Jakub Narebski wrote:
> 
> > The workaround is to put all large files for example in 'media/' folder,
> > and make this folder be submodule. Each clone of repository can have
> > this 'media' submodule either present (both in object database, although
> > usually separate from main project object database), or not present
> > (not cloned and not checked out).
> 
> Tim was talking about that media/ folder and managing that in git. If you want 
> to work on the media, you might end up getting hundreds of gigabytes of data 
> to get that folder, even if you only need to change one single file.
> 
> That's the issue we're running into, and I don't thing submodules solve this 
> at all.

Ah, well... Submodules cannot be workaround for _this_ issue. You can
have only all or nothing: either all files in media/ or none of them,
both in working directory like in repository object database... well
unless you subdivide further.

I guess that mentioned work on the media is in remote setting (you
cannot have main repository on network drive) so Dana How's proposed
solution would not work for you, is it?

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux