* Francis Galiegue <fg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [2008-11-10 08:55]:
> Le Monday 10 November 2008 01:38:30 Ian Hilt, vous avez écrit :
> > On Sun, 9 Nov 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > > Ian Hilt <ian.hilt@xxxxxxx> writes:
> > > > On Sun, 9 Nov 2008, Francis Galiegue wrote:
> > > >> Le Sunday 09 November 2008 13:59:48 Ian Hilt, vous avez écrit :
> > > >> > + if ($c_file =~ /^To:\s*+(.+)\s*\nCc:/ism) {
> > > >>
> > > >> Greedy operators are only supported with perl 5.10 or more... I think
> > > >> it's a bad idea to use them...
Possessive quantification is supported in much earlier versions
of Perl, it’s just more awkward syntactically:
/^To:(?>\s*)(.+)\s*\nCc:/ism
But possessification is not going to make a difference in this
regex, since .+ can match anything that \s* can also match, so
the only difference is that if the regex does happen to
backtrack, it will backtrack over all the spaces after the To:
at once instead of one at a time.
I have only just subscribed so I do not have enough context to
know what the problem is, but based on what I have seen so far it
seems to me that all you want is simply
/^To:\s?(.+)\s*\nCc:/ism
although I have to wonder if the /s modifier here is really what
you want.
> I think the correct term for *+, ++, ?+ etc is "possessive"
> quantifiers, I'm just not sure.
That is correct.
Regards,
--
Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
