Re: libgit2 - a true git library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
During the GitTogether we were kicking around the idea of a ground-up
implementation of a Git library.  This may be easier than trying
to grind down git.git into a library, as we aren't tied to any
of the current global state baggage or the current die() based
error handling.

I've started an _extremely_ rough draft.  The code compiles into a
libgit.a but it doesn't even implement what it describes in the API,
let alone a working Git implementation.  Really what I'm trying to
incite here is some discussion on what the API looks like.

Just a random question: is there a reason why you have put all the .h in a separate includes/ directory instead of relying on the install target to put the include files at the right place ?

To me it makes it much harder to hack on the files as one is always required to switch between both directories...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux