Re: [minor usability suggestion] git rebase <upstream> --onto <newbase> ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 7 Nov 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> >  earth4:~/tip> git rebase 685aebb --onto linus
> >  Current branch core/urgent is up to date.
> > ...
> > For example "git log" is exemplary in this area as it accepts just 
> > about any permutation of parameters thrown at it, ...
> 
> Not really.
> 
> There may be oddball commands whose parameter order have been established
> differently long before "git log" came, but almost all of them now use the
> same convention used by the "git log" family, which is flags/options then
> revs (and then paths if the operation makes sense with paths).  And rebase
> is not one of the oddball ones.
> 
> Your "rebase" example is a rev then a flag/option, which is not how any
> other git command take its command line parameters.

"git log origin/master -p" works, though. It's paths, not revisions, that 
can't appear before options (or revisions).

	-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux