Re: [PATCH 0/4] replace unsinged long with time_t

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 6 Nov 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:

In theory, some platform might have a 64-but "unsigned long long" time_t even if the architecture is 32-bit (apparently windows used to do that if you included <time64.h>, for example), but since we wouldn't take advantage of that anyway, even then there is no real advantage.

It could also be worth to notice that there are even 64-bit architectures that feature 32-bit 'time_t'...

--

 / daniel.haxx.se
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux