On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 10:36:42PM -0800, Andrew Arnott wrote: > Yes, on git status. I'm afraid I don't know how to look up the > reference you gave. Sorry, gmane is back up, so the link is: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/99147 With that patch, and this one on top, "git status" should respect your rename limits (though I haven't tested it). --- diff --git a/wt-status.c b/wt-status.c index c3a9cab..0b92ac3 100644 --- a/wt-status.c +++ b/wt-status.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ static void wt_status_print_updated(struct wt_status *s) rev.diffopt.format_callback = wt_status_print_updated_cb; rev.diffopt.format_callback_data = s; rev.diffopt.detect_rename = 1; - rev.diffopt.rename_limit = 200; rev.diffopt.break_opt = 0; run_diff_index(&rev, 1); } -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
