Re: Git SVN Rebranching Issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > It was actually an intentional design decision on my part preserve
> > parents based on branch name.  We would eventually otherwise lose
> > history of the now-deleted branches, as reflogs can expire.
> 
> Would it not be better to save the old branch using "@SVN-NUMBER" as
> suffix? Thus, those do not need the old branch can easily delete it.

I would second this approach.  

Our svn repository isn't particularly big or old, but if someone were to
make a branch now, there is a fair chance it will have the same name as
an old branch but have absolutely nothing to do with that old branch.
The situation will only get worse as our svn repository grows and more
branches are created/deleted.

Matt

-- 
Matt Kern
http://www.undue.org/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux