Re: [PATCH] Documentation: add a planning document for the next CLI revamp

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 14:27 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> >> +  * 'git push --matching' does what 'git push' does today (without
> >> +    explicit configuration)
> >
> > I think this is reasonable even without other changes, just to override
> > any configuration.
> 
> I don't.  Can't you say "git push $there HEAD" these days?  I vaguely
> recall that there is a way to configure push that way for people too lazy
> to type "origin HEAD" after "git push".

I don't think it's about laziness, it's more about making sure that
without specifying behaviour, the action of the command is conservative.
Pushing all matching refs is not conservative; it's "magic".  And in my
experience, people get bitten by it, because they think, "ok, time to
push this branch", type "git push" and then a lot more than they
expected gets pushed.

I can see that some people want this behaviour by default; but to me
"push the current branch back to where it came from" seems like far more
a rational default for at least 90% of users.

Sam.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux