Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > > > My take on the consensus for the license part of the discussion is > > that libgit2 should be under the "GPL gcc library" license. > > > > BTW, I can't actually find a copy of that license; the only thing > > I can locate in the GCC SVN tree is a copy of the LGPL. > > The exception is usually found at the top of files constituting > libgcc.a. One example is gcc/config/arm/ieee754-df.S. ;-) Headers updated. Its now GPL+gcc library exception. Not that the 5 lines of useful code there really needs copyright, but hey, whatever. -- Shawn. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
